James Hillman e a Fenomenologia: a base poética da psique

João L. Corá Silva; Carlos A. Serbena

Authors

João L. Corá Silva Universidade Federal do Paraná
Carlos A. Serbena Universidade Federal do Paraná

Keywords:

Archetypal Psychology, Phenomenology, Epistemology, Poiesis, James Hillman

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to reflect and point to the possible epistemological and ontological horizons of James Hillman’s archetypal psychology by approaching it to a possible relationship with phenomenology. In order to fulfill this intention, it is necessary to delimit two starting points, namely: The central motto of archetypal psychology of “stick to the image” and its possible relationship with the phenomenological notion of “back to things themselves”; The postulate of a mytho-poetic basis for the human psyche and the possible approach to the notion of poiesis as presented in Heidegger’s phenomenology. Archetypal psychology emerges in a new “post-Jungian” context that seeks to replace an interpretive, univocal and metaphysical attitude with a phenomenological attitude towards images of the soul. The mytho-poetic basis and “stick to the image”, central notions in his psychology, constitute the basis of this possible phenomenological attitude in his thinking.

Author Biographies

João L. Corá Silva, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Psychologist (PUC-PR), specialist in Analytical Psychology (PUC-PR). Master in Philosophy (PUCPR). Master student in Clinical Psychology (UFPR).

Carlos A. Serbena, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Eletric Engineer (UFPR), Psychologist (UFPR). Master in Psychology (UFSC). PhD in Humanities (UFSC). Associated Professor at Federal University of Paraná. Professor of the Pós-Graduate Program of Psychology from UFPR and he is the coordinator of the Epistemology and interfaces of Analytical Psychology work group in Anpepp.

References

BROOKE, R. Jung and phenomenology. Pittsburgh: Trivium, 2009.

____ . Pathways into the jungian world: phenomenology and analytical psychology. London: Routledge, 2000.

CASEY, E. Introduction. In: HILLMAN, J. (Org.). Philosophical intimations. 8. unif. ed. Thompson: Spring, 2016. p. 5-23.

HEIDEGGER, M. A origem da obra de arte. Lisboa: 70, 2007.

____ . Carta sobre o humanismo. 2. ed. São Paulo: Centauro, 2005.

HILLMAN, J. Emotion: a comprehensive phenomenology of theories and their meaning for therapy. Evanston: North- western University, 1992.

____ . From types to images. 4. unif. ed. Thompson: Spring, 2019.

____ . Psicologia arquetípica: um breve relato. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1988.

____ . Re-vendo a psicologia. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2010.

JUNG, C. G. Ab-reação, análise dos sonhos e transferência. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2011.

____ . A natureza da psique. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2013a.

____ . Estudos alquímicos. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002.

____ . Memórias, sonhos, reflexões. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2016.

____ . Psicologia do inconsciente. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2013b.

____ . Psicogênese das doenças mentais. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2015.

SAMUELS, A. Jung e os pós-junguianos. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1989.

____ . New developments in the post-jungian field. In: YOUNG-EISENDRATH, P.; DAWSON, T. The cambridge companion to Jung. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2008. p. 1-18

RUSSELL, D. The life and ideas of James Hillman Volume I: the making of a psychologist. New York: Helios, 2003.

SHAMDASANI, S. Jung e a construção da psicologia mod- erna: o sonho de uma ciência. São Paulo: Ideias & Letras, 2005.

TACEY, D. Twisting and turning with James Hillman: from anima to world soul, from academia to pop. In: CASEMENT, A. Post-junguians today: key papers in contemporany ana- lytical psychology. London: Routledge, 1998. p. 215-34.